![]() ![]() |
|
Home > What's New Library Blog
|
|
|
|
|   |
Top Sites Not So Top
PC Magazine put together a list of the "Top 101 Web Sites."
These lists are always so silly. Who uses the Web that way? Like they list ESPN.com as an entertainment site. Isn't ESPN.com more sports or news? And does anyone not know ESPN.com exists? I'm also curious if this list appeared in print. That would be really rough. Imagine sitting with the magazine open on your lap, typing in all those URLs, unaware it's all online. People use sites for specific purposes. I'm not sure they go and check out sites because the site made a list.
posted by Steve in the Library on Friday, October 29, 2004
See How Boston Won in 1918
I'm not sure if you heard, but the Boston Red Sox won the World Series.
It was their first World Series win since 1918. If you want to read about that World Series win, you might want to check out ProQuest New York Times Historic, one of our databases. To find the original story, just do a search for Red Sox and Boston and World Series and then click in the "On This Day" box and type in 09/12/1918. You'll be rewarded with the game day story from 1918. And just for fun, do the same search for the date 10/28/1986. If you're a Mets fan, you'll be glad you did.
posted by Steve in the Library on Thursday, October 28, 2004
Keep News in Newspaper
Today's New York Post has a special section on the subway. One interesting thing about the section is that one of the stories refers you to the Post Web site for more of the story. I couldn't help but wonder what will happen in 50 years, when that part of the Web is gone. People will find an article in Nexis but still won't have the whole story. It seems like it'll be very frustrating.
We depend on newspapers not just for news, but for history. And when newspapers don't think about their role, they end up losing a lot of information that could be helpful in future years. It's great to see a paper taking advantage of the space of the Web. It would just be better to see them take a longer view of the process.
posted by Steve in the Library on Wednesday, October 27, 2004
New Amazon look
Amazon.com just tweaked the look of their site (or I just noticed it, anyway).
It looks like a lot less tabs at the top. It seems like you're searching the whole store now, rather than just sections. I don't see any kind of explanation anywhere, though. I think online entities are starting to take for granted that their users will just figure new interfaces out. That's why it's so important for users, like us, to not be afraid to play around and see what happens when we try a search. Because really, we have no choice. Without experimentation, we won't find out how to use these tools.
posted by Steve in the Library on Tuesday, October 26, 2004
Acrobat to Get More Acrobatic
Adobe, the makers of Acrobat, which we use to view PDFs, and Yahoo! are teaming up.
The partnership seems designed to make Acrobat more usable day-to-day. It'll make Acrobat documents more searchable and easier to access. If you've ever used a PDF (which is basically an online Xerox), like in one of our online databases, you probably noticed that they're not the easiest files to deal with. It's cool that they show you what a page looked like, but they take a long time to open up and searching them can be very hard especially in New York Times Historic. So here's to Adobe for trying to make their technology easier to use. Let's hope it works out.
posted by Steve in the Library on Monday, October 25, 2004
British Library Archiving E-Mails
Wow. The British Library is starting to archive emails and electronic documents.
And they're not just looking for materials from famous people. They say they're more concerned with influential people. After they get that part up and running, the British Library wants to archive instant messaging conversations. On the one hand, it's really exciting to think about all of the insight we'll be able to get into the thought processes of scientists, world leaders, and business giants (assuming they agree to hand all of this material over). On the other hand, you have to guess that some of the materials unearthed will be things like this: Scientist1: what's for lunch? Scientist2: pizza? Scientist1: had it 4 dinner. deli ok? Scientist2: :-)
posted by Steve in the Library on Friday, October 22, 2004
Don't Change the Search Tool; Change What You Search
The Washington Post takes a look at different search tools and applications today, bravely speculating that people are looking for the next big search innovation.
Of course, the issue might not be how people search the Internet, but what's on the Internet. There's just a lot of bad sites out there and those bad sites wind up cluttering search results. Add in the commerce sites, which are good, but are trying to sell you something, and it makes it seem like any Internet search tool is almost destined to fail. Database searching gives searchers a lot more control over what they're looking for. Obviously databases aren't as big as the Internet, but that's what makes them so much more efficient to use. How many documents do you need telling you when Princess Diana and Prince Charles first got married? A Google search finds over 5,000 documents. A Lexis Nexis seach finds 146. Which would you rather read through?
posted by Steve in the Library on Thursday, October 21, 2004
Wow. Microsoft is getting ready to release a software package that combines e-mail, instant messaging, e-mail, video conferencing, and phone service. The idea of the software is to let people know the best way to reach you at any given moment. Like if you're not at you're desk, a phone call won't do you much good, so I guess the software would suggest another means of communication.
It's an interesting idea for libraries, though. Right now we offer chat and e-mail reference (and by the way, we only have chat from 3-4 PM today). But using this software, patrons could be told which way will yield a quicker answer. Professors could also probably use it to keep in touch with their students. It seems like it'll just give people a lot more flexibility.
posted by Steve in the Library on Wednesday, October 20, 2004
Google Desktop Search Danger
Just a quick update. Yesterday we wrote about the Google Desktop search tool.
Today comes the warning it could be dangerous for public computers, like the kind in libraries. It seems the danger of the search tool is that it would give every user on a computer access to what the previous user did including Web sites visited and e-mails sent. One of the ways to get around the Google Desktop tool is to use a non Microsoft browser like Firefox. I just started using Firefox this week and it's a great alternative to Internet Explorer. The pop-up blocker is better and it even lets you block ads. You'll be hearing a lot more about Firefox in the next few weeks. The company is getting ready to launch an advertising campaign for the free (yes, it's free!) browser.
posted by Steve in the Library on Tuesday, October 19, 2004
Everything is Searchable
Google has created a download you can use to search your computer, the way you use Google to search the Internet. Even though it's in beta, meaning it's not perfect yet, tons of places are writing about it. In fact, a quick Google news search for stories on the Google desktop found almost 1,000 Monday morning.
So far, the reviews seem OK, although as it stands right now, Google Desktop only works well with Microsoft products. Those of us using Web browsers like Firefox and word processing programs like OpenOffice are left out of the full functionality. And if you use a Mac, you can't even use Google Desktop. That's why, in the long run, it seems like it's better to just keep your files organized. Isn't it easier to not need a product like Google Desktop to find your files? Just because we can find a needle in a haystack doesn't mean we need to keep throwing needles into the haystack, does it?
posted by Steve in the Library on Monday, October 18, 2004
Politics Finds Wikis
We talked about Wikis last month. Wikis are Web pages that can be updated by any user.
Red Herring has an article about Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that's built from member contributions. Apparently people are messing with the entries for George Bush and John Kerry, making the content seem biased. That's always been the big knock against Wikis they're too easy to alter. Since there's no real control on the information, you're never sure if what you're reading is accurate. Wikipedia has some plans to deal with these issues, though. They've occasionally made the Kerry and Bush entries uneditable. And they have plans to hire editors to review the content. But those editors will probably want to be paid. And if the editors are paid, writers will also want to be paid. And if writers and editors are putting in all of this work, they might not appreciate anyone being able to change it. So Wikipedia might have to start charging for content as they make it less alterable. The result? It could wind up like more traditional online encyclopedias.
posted by Steve in the Library on Friday, October 15, 2004
9/11 Report Award-Nominated
Who says government reports are dull?
Certainly not the National Book Awards. They nominated the 9/11 report in the nonfiction category. While the award nomination is honoring the print edition published by WW Norton, the full-text of the report is available online for free. You can even find in in our catalog by doing a search for 9/11 report. You can see the record here. The catalog record will take you to the actual report. Or you can check it out of the library.
posted by Steve in the Library on Thursday, October 14, 2004
Friendster Meets EBSCO
AP has an interesting look at networking sites like Friendster.com and Ryze.com. You know. Those sites where you put up all your personal information and get friends to join and then you can see how everyone knows each other? Well apparently investors like them, too.
But what do they like if these services are free? How will they make any money? It seems some analysts think they can make money by charging "power users" for enhanced access to their database (and that's what these sites are databases. They're no different than anything in EBSCOHost). So what does this have to do with libraries? Everything. The value of these networking sites only emerges when some kind of order is applied to it. When you make information easier to search, it becomes more valuable. And that's why the the library's online databases are so important and so valuable. You're getting quality, searchable information. That's why it's not available for free online. Because people are willing to pay for it.
posted by Steve in the Library on Wednesday, October 13, 2004
Chat Comes of Age
Online chat continues to lose its innocence.
First, the concept becomes almost synonymous with online sexual predators. Now, the government is funding a study to figure out how to better monitor chat rooms for terrorism talk. It seems the study is mostly concerned with chat rooms, but not one-on-one chat sessions. But it does seem like it will have some privacy implications. But we can't imagine anyone would have any problems with someone using our Ask-A-Librarian chat service (open weekdays from 2-4 PM). If you're stuck on a research problem, it's a great way to get some help without getting offline. So some chat is scary, but a lot of it is helpful and constructive. Let's take chat back and make it positive again!
posted by Steve in the Library on Tuesday, October 12, 2004
WMD Report Available Online
Here is the CIA's report on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. It's 1,000 pages but it's all there online.
While we often try to warn students about the wealth of bad information on the Internet, we should try to remember there's also a wealth of great information. If you want to read up on what the newspapers are telling you about this report, you can. And it's painless. You can do it from home in your pajamas at 3 in the morning. That's not even the best part, though. Right now the report is a PDF, which is basically like a Web-posted Xerox. But right now hundred of people are probably converting it to HTML, which is more readable and quicker to download. People are also probably creating tools to make the report more accessible. New York-based blogger Jason Kottke took the 9/11 Report Executive Summary (which looked like this), and turned it into this. Notice how he made each section linkable. That allows online writers to link to specific parts of the document to make their point. So when the government makes a key document available online, that's really only the start of the process of creating a usable resource.
posted by Steve in the Library on Friday, October 08, 2004
Vote!
Tomorrow is the last day to register to vote in the upcoming elections. If you haven't registered yet, you have to get out an application by midnight tonight (or postmarked that way, anyway). Here are the forms.
posted by Steve in the Library on Thursday, October 07, 2004
Washington State Puts It All Online
Washington state has put a ton of its public records online.
It looks like it'll be great for things like genealogy. And it could be great when you lose something important, like a marriage license, and need another copy. You have to wonder about privacy, though. It seems there's an awful lot of personal information now just waiting to be exploited by evil-doers. Check out the archive here.
posted by Steve in the Library on Wednesday, October 06, 2004
Google: 'You Mean There's Stuff Online We Don't Know About?'
Google has a cool new feature. They're starting to offer book content online. That means that if you do a search and Google finds it in one of the books it has excerpted, you'll see that book as a link in the results. You should see a book on this list of returns. It says [BOOK] next to it.
The funny thing is what Google says on their FAQ page for this project: "It turns out that not all the world's information is already on the Internet..." Is Google just finding this out? Were they somehow unaware of databases or the Invisible Web? Have they never taken a Bibliographic Instruction class here at LaGuardia? But it's still a handy feature. One shockingly similar to what Amazon.com offers on their new search site.
posted by Steve in the Library on Tuesday, October 05, 2004
New Yahoo! Page
According to the Washington Post, Yahoo!, the popular search portal, is giving their homepage a new look.
It seems Yahoo! will now be a bit more customizable and will feature more changing, or dynamic, content, that will be updated throughout the day. Things like weather and news. You can see the new page here. It's always interesting to watch Yahoo! evolve. It started off as an organized list of Web sites, tried being a search engine for a while, but right now seems to be more of a news service. That's a lot of change for a company that just started in 1995.
posted by Steve in the Library on Monday, October 04, 2004
The Importance of Checking a Catalog
Speaking of catalogs (see below), maybe someone should teach the New York Times about them. Earlier this week, they wrote about a "previously unknown story" by Ernest Hemingway.
Today, it turns out, the story was known. The Times printed a correction. But if they had just checked the holdings of the John F. Kennedy Library and Museum, they could have seen a listing for the story in Hemingway's papers. You can see it here on page 80.
posted by Steve in the Library on Friday, October 01, 2004
CUNY+
Unfortunately, we're having some technical difficulties with the CUNY+ catalog. If you need help finding a book, feel free to ask a librarian at the reference desk.
posted by Steve in the Library on Friday, October 01, 2004
|